![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Ah yes, my country also has serious problems and therefore it is not only relevant but equivalent.
Ah yes, my country also has serious problems and therefore it is not only relevant but equivalent.
Ok, I didn’t get this joke until like 15 minutes later and had to come back to upvote it. Amazing. Punkry Western.
Where can I get my membership card, shirt, and other swag as a member of David Tennant’s Gender Taliban
Uh, the PlayStation 2 would like a word?
Good job not reading any part of the article and confidently announcing your completely incorrect take on things to everyone.
They started with an electric leaf blower as a baseline. Theirs is 40% quieter than the current electric leaf blowers on the market.
Ethically and logically it seems like output based on training data is clearly derivative work. Legally I suspect AI will continue to be the new powerful tool that enables corporations to shit on and exploit the works of countless people.
That license would require chatgpt to provide attribution every time it used training data of anyone there and also would require every output using that training data to be placed under the same license. This would actually legally prevent anything chatgpt created even in part using this training data from being closed source. Assuming they obviously aren’t planning on doing that this is massively shitting on the concept of licensing.
It’s funny/sad the stark contrast between the ones where you can’t really tell why they’re defederated from just the name vs the ones where it’s extremely obvious (and how little in-between there is)
Honest question, why do people diss on Nord? (I’m also happy with Nord)
I assume the proportions of people who spoof their OS is slanted towards Linux