![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
It’s very easy to get a Gnome look and feel with Plasma nowadays.
I still don’t know why Gnome loves wasting 3 % of the screen on an empty black bar, tho.
It’s very easy to get a Gnome look and feel with Plasma nowadays.
I still don’t know why Gnome loves wasting 3 % of the screen on an empty black bar, tho.
That is absolutely amazing
Not my experience so far with my single service I’ve been running for a year. It’s making me even think of opening up even more stuff.
Maybe you are just dealing with the new Plasma 6.1 feature for multi-monitor setups? It’s pretty useful, but I find it annoying too, and thankfully this is KDE, so there’s always the possibility to make it your way.
Sponsors will pay if you are big enough, no matter the platform. If PeerTube went big, you’d probably start seeing sponsors.
Then publish on both!
I am expecting that is exactly the point. I don’t think they’ll win, tho. We’ll find a way around it.
I could understand that some distros’ kernel had binary blobs, but the main kernel?? I was not expecting that if it’s true.
Let’s face it, if you install Linux (or even Windows!) for your mom, you put VLC in there.
Yes, some other tools are better at some things, but VLC is the perfect choice for the “standard” user.
If you are not hosting, it having a repo on Github makes no difference. The server you are connecting to might have a different service running and you cannot know.
Let’s say you have 2 scripts that do some stuff:
If you want those things to happen independently you must parallelize them.
So think about an automation that at a certain point you want to launch multiple scripts. I’d always parallelize, even if initially these scripts were “instantaneous”, because you might change these and add more complexities in the future.
Parallel stuff is also used for… Well, some sequences you want to run in parallel.
Also, test your automations! Specially those critical. It’s very essy, you can virtually trigger them.
I would say that does apply in the case of Endeavour OS but shouldn’t for a custom install with 100 % Arch+AUR packages.
*GUI installer
The dracut-systemdboot thing makes no sense. If you are installing Arch Linux, you have all options available? There is no “default” Arch, 😅
Sorry I don’t understand your first question.
What I mean is that anyone (in fact there were projects that did this) could make an image with an installer GUI for Arch Linux that installed Arch Linux and some opinionated software like Endeavour does. But at the end you just got an easy Arch installation. What bothers me is that instead of pushing for Arch Linux’s brand, Endeavour created their own, virtually wrapping Arch Linux as theirs, and I don’t believe it is enough work to consider it a different distro, because it is LITERALLY ARCH with a couple of extra packages (that could be on the main repos or the AUR).
And I am saying all this as an Endeavour user myself!
That’s what I said.