![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Honest answer? Kids toys ads. The kids love the ads more than the show sometimes.
It sucks for parents though. Gets expensive.
Honest answer? Kids toys ads. The kids love the ads more than the show sometimes.
It sucks for parents though. Gets expensive.
I hope this concept comes to the US at some point.
getting sued for their employer-imposed vaccine mandates
The only case I’ve seen succeed is for a company that ignored legitimate religious exceptions. Have you seen any successful cases that support your use case?
Namecheap is reputable and WAY cheaper than that. Been using them for years.
It’s more like it you put it on your porch and say “free take a copy”.
You’re allowed to video tape in public for profit. Do we consider paying photos online to be public?
Because they don’t use technology. Their crimes are done in person.
He never fathomed the depths that YT would drag him to if he didn’t curate his algorithm.
100% this. The algorithms are designed to give you what keeps your attention. You need to be careful about what you give attention to.
This confuses me. You want something without an algorithm… because you used systems before their algorithm kicked in and hated it?
The crap you got was because it didn’t know enough about you to know what you like. Without an algorithm, that’d be your feed forever.
The approach is generic. The implementation is case by case. But this is exactly the problem. When the implementation is generic, like a vaccine, then you can mass produce it and the costs go down.
As far as this seems, you can’t mass produce this solution. You can mass implement the approach, but that doesn’t really bring the cost down.
That doesn’t make it readable. That makes it efficient.
Readable is able to read quickly and easily. That name has too much information.
The ones that aren’t forced to care by regulators. So basically anyone that isn’t finance or defense.
I tricked target into lowering prices by using this coupon they had on their website! Mwhahaha.
Google will just use this as a way to flag their tech savvy and anti-ai users. It’s just another data point.
“kill ai search for good”
Yeah, ok. It’s a feature and Google will kill it eventually.
Fridges last like 30 years
To be fair, these are Samsung.
Steal those too
That’s the issue though. As far as I know it hasn’t been tested in court and it’s quite possible the law is useless and has no teeth.
With AI porn you can point to real victims whose unconsented pictures were used to train the models, and say that’s abuse. But when it’s just a drawing, who is the victim? Is it just a thought crime? Can we prosecute those?
Would Lisa Simpson be 8 years old, or 43 because the Simpsons started in 1989?
It’s when appointed officials side with the people, and the people are educated and thoughtful.
Or so I’m told. I’ve never actually seen one. It’s like a unicorn.