![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
yeah ads famously criticize the product and talk about how dangerous it is
yeah ads famously criticize the product and talk about how dangerous it is
if you think it doesn’t work on you, it’s more likely to work on you. if it didn’t work the world would be a much better place, but unfortunately they definitely work.
but i agree it’s stupid especially as a business model and it shouldn’t exist.
6751 6686 here… I’m glad it’s finally getting a burial since it died like 20 years ago.
to be fair, it’s still known as Twitter as well, just not officially named that
(i do realize this also applied to prince)
well i can’t give a definitive answer there; I’m just a bird lawyer
corporations are people when it comes to “free speech” (read: political bribes) but they aren’t when it comes to accountability. this is what happens when you don’t treat corporations like people and fucking jail them for shit like this.
what a stupid idea… actually regulate them you fucking cowards.
“extremely interested in your genitals”
not society, capital owners.
yeah but then it doesn’t make sense to refuse to call it AI.
couldn’t you at least choose a name with different initials?
“wait, you said you’d protect me. i got into a fight right in front of you and you didn’t help at all!”
“oh but i did, boss. i was going to join in and kick your ass as well but decided to protect you from my ass kicking and stood still instead”
lol as if they are doing it to protect anybody.
nothing YouTube ever does, or Google for that matter, is to protect anything but their ad revenue.
so bring extra… noted.
i didn’t say that. i meant it’s a stupid name for this.
just like duckduckgo; i like ddg but that’s a terrible name for a search engine.
well for starters it sounds less stupid
that’s right
deleted by creator
making Adobe roll in money, i guess
actually ads probably won’t work on you because you don’t have basic reading comprehension