![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Yeah, on my good headphones the difference is quite noticeable
Yeah, on my good headphones the difference is quite noticeable
Re: tidal on Linux, if you use Arch there are a couple of options in the AUR. I don’t know about other distros.
linux as a non supported web browser
I’m confused about this one, lol. I did not know that Linux was a browser rofl
I’ll bash them if and when they’ll start to do shitty stuff. For now they are great
They have recently changed that. Lossless is now part of the basic plan
Friendly reminder that Tidal costs the same, has a bigger catalog, does not pester you with podcasts, has lossless quality audio and it includes lyrics
Tidal has recently eliminated its most expensive plan and bundled everything it offered into the cheaper tier. So it’s actually the opposite of enshittification. I love it
GUYS, IT’S HAPPENING
Still awesome!
Glad to be able to help! Have fun :)
That’s the joke
BSODs
To answer that, you must understand how testing works. Packages first are updated in Sid (unstable), then they go to Testing. At a certain point of the release cycle, Testing stops being updated to become the new Stable version. So basically Testing is not constantly updated. Also, security patches don’t follow this route: instead, they arrive in Sid first (thanks to the maintainers themselves) and then they get into Stable first (by the Debian team) because Stable has the priority. Only after that, they arrive in Testing.
Also see this paragraph from the Debian Wiki regarding security:
Security for testing benefits from the security efforts of the entire project for unstable. However, there is a minimum two-day migration delay, and sometimes security fixes can be held up by transitions. The Security Team helps to move along those transitions holding back important security uploads, but this is not always possible and delays may occur. Especially in the months after a new stable release, when many new versions are uploaded to unstable, security fixes for testing may lag behind.
Also:
Compared to stable and unstable, next-stable testing has the worst security update speed. Don’t prefer testing if security is a concern.
My advice to everyone who wants Debian to be more current is to just run Sid (unstable). It’s always going to be more secure and up-to date than Testing. Also, it works like a rolling-release distro, i.e. the updates are incremental and constant
EDIT: whatever you do, read and follow this guide. apt-listbugs and apt-listchanges especially will save your ass constantly
Anything that has less than 6GB of RAM nowadays it completely useless for normal use. Don’t buy it.
man, those screenshots hurt
Could someone explain to me the advantage of using snap? I’ve never really got it. Repository systems with dependencies have always served me well and I’ve never felt the need for something else
I don’t know about VST specifically, but you should look into Bitwig, if you’re looking for professional audio programs like FL Studio
Sure, now let’s get you to take your pills
So do I generally, but it has to be structured well, and the Debian website unfortunately ain’t
What has been debunked was the whole story regarding MQA audio, which now they have abandoned. Now it is truly lossless