Cinnamon doesn’t support it yet either, so I’m also not on it :(
I jumped off Reddit’s cliff and landed here just like many other Lemmings.
Cinnamon doesn’t support it yet either, so I’m also not on it :(
Haha thanks. I think it’s a lost cause! Perhaps I shouldn’t have worded the post the way I did.
I suspect this is what I’ll have to do. I was hoping to avoid it as that’ll take a weekend of copying, but I might just have to bite the bullet.
I’m not using Windows. I run Debian on this server.
The bulk of external enclosures that money can buy tell the computer they’re plugged into that the disks have logical sector sizes of 4096 bytes, apparently for compatibility with >2TB drives on Windows XP.
I do not need compatibility with Windows XP as the current year is 2024. My disk has logical sectors 512 bytes in size, but the external enclosures don’t report that. I want to know how I can mount the disk anyway, despite the enclosure’s attempts to thwart me. I know the disk is fine, as it is detected with 512 byte sectors and mounts happily via SATA.
It’s never been in a Windows machine.
The only enclosure I have that works out of the box is one of those “SATA to USB adaptors” rather than a bona fide “3.5 inch drive enclosure”. It’s not ideal for long-term use.
I wonder if there’s a place to find out if any given make/model of enclosure will report the sector size as 512 bytes. Then, presumably, one could purchase an enclosure off that list and be confident the disk will be readable.
Yes, the last code block in my OP shows the result of attempting to mount /dev/sdc1 normally: mount: /mnt: special device /dev/sdc1 does not exist.
Though I do not believe it is required as I can mount other drives to /mnt just fine, I have attempted to make /met/tmp and mount there to no avail.
No - I’ve been working on a headless server, and ideally I need this thing to be written into /etc/fstab
and work reliably from the command line. I could plug the drive into my laptop to have a look in some GUI tools if you think there’s one around that can circumvent the sector size mismatch, but in the end I’ll need a CLI method.
I use Xournal++, too. Note that the original Xournal is no longer maintained, but Xournal++ is.
It’s supposed to be a clone of Windows Journal - the precursor to OneNote. It’s very good at exporting to and annotating PDFs, and I use it for all my classwork. Windows Journal worked great for me back in the day, and Xournal++ continues to do so today.
All that said, I’m saving this post so I can try out some of the alternatives listed here in the future.
I just run my own nextcloud instance. Everything important is synced to that with the nextcloud desktop client, and the server keeps a month’s worth of backups on my NAS via rsync.
Replying from my Xperia 10 IV.
It’s purchase was a mistake.
I’m stuck on Android :(
It’s far more than basic image editing, but it’s also far more akin to Photoshop than GIMP is imo.
I haven’t found a way to replicate that, yet. I’d love a start orb hanging off the taskbar in modern Cinnamon or something, but it doesn’t seem possible.
It’s a shame this is such an old screenshot. I wanted to ask about specifics!!
I run Debian servers and Fedora workstations, which works really well for me. The rock solid stability of Debian is exactly what I want in a server, and the perfect blend of it-just-works and blending-edge that Fedora provides is great for a daily driver.
Unless I’m mistaken, the current ordeal with RHEL should not affect Fedora, as RHEL is a derivative of Fedora in the same way Ubuntu is a derivative of Debian. As such, I see no reason to move away just yet - though if that changes, I’ll go OpenSUSE. Arch just isn’t for me.
I’ve been daily driving a Lenovo X230 tablet for the last four years. I use Xournal++ to take notes with the pen in classes and at work. Works great!