I wouldn’t trust the Java app sandbox at all. They basically abandoned it.
I wouldn’t trust the Java app sandbox at all. They basically abandoned it.
The thing is the whole c program is unsafe. In rust individual parts are marked unsafe. This means auditing should be easier. Also being always on your toes isn’t really viable. Breaking down the program into safe vs unsafe is probably an improvment
In cases where bugs have been counted they tended to make up the majority of vulnerabilities. Chrome, Firefox, and Windows reported that around 70% of security vulnerabilites were memory corruption. Yes a subset, but the majority of the worst subset.
I will not stand slander of the arch wiki.
Also start with Linux Mint XFCE (unless they’ve fixed the stability problems with cinnamon)
The article doesn’t count the popups you get when you try to change your default browser
While that is an interesting idea I suspect the actual reason is their efforts to get it FDA certified as a medical device (which still hasn’t happened). The current app makes it abundantly clear it is not currently certified and a third party app claiming otherwise might be a liability concern.
Probably wiping process control code from the systems that contain tons of fiddly hard to find constants and other information.