![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/eb9cfeb5-4eb5-4b1b-a75c-8d9e04c3f856.png)
So you don’t care about the instance you want to ban all the users from there. That’s quite open minded and tolerant!
So you don’t care about the instance you want to ban all the users from there. That’s quite open minded and tolerant!
It’s Remote Desktop Protocol. A Microsoft protocol for taking controle of a remote (Windows) computer.
“something as simple as RDP” haha hahaha you’re a funny one!
My recent experience with helping a friend with an nvidia card to work on Linux is that I never want to touch an nvidia card again.
Also, please tell me which average user makes its own windows installation. When I was young in the 90s I was paid to install windows in my village.
But yes, much progress is still needed to smooth the installation. The problem is that the hardware is often a fault though, through their shitty drivers.
No one needs office unless the company forces it.
The technology required to make a modern computer is, to say the least, not easily accessible. There are very few places we’re chips are made. A handful on the planet. I mean in large quantities.
Otherwise you have laboratories mostly that have the tools to make the chips.
It is technically possible to make a free computer. But it will be much more expensive and much worse. So why bother?
That’s plain wrong. That’s not honest, that’s elitist at best.
No user ever installed windows. So the whole installation and driver thing is a dishonest question.
Even for gaming on a custom PC, just take an amd card and games on steam, it’ll run smoothly.
Browsing Internet and desktop? Works fine on Linux. Fuck office, you don’t need it.
If you need a computer for a specific software, that’s a different matter. But presenting it like everyone is concerned is dishonest.
The security paragraph is complete nonsense. And obnoxiously rebooting is a major hindrance for most people, and it’s not avoidable without the professional licence.
It’s not 2010 anymore.
The average user doesn’t install windows. I used to get paid when I was a kid to install windows in my village.
I wasn’t clear I think but I meant that they certainly have data about the migration to Linux.
French gendarmerie moved to Linux like a decade ago. They certainly have something about it.
You do not. Or we have a different definition for owning.
This is the perfect comparison!
I deleted windows btw, and I’m very happy about it.
Creating standards to trap users is not improving technology.
I just thought of a better word for their ideology: techno-feudalism. They are not optimist or humanist, they crave for power and controle.
What I hate the most is that they are literally stealing science, technology and progress to enforce their techno-feudalism.
That’s unfortunate. I consider myself a technooptimist, but I am anything but a believer of liberalism or capitalism.
Maybe you don’t know what empirically means? Your ignorance is not a proof for anything. I know what I can do with libreoffice, and I am very mediocre with it. I’ve never seen an excel document that couldn’t be done with libreoffice.
And I wrote most things that can be done with excel. Now, if you want something that can be debated, I posit that anything that can’t be done in libreoffice calc but can be in excel is not worth doing in excel.
Chipset fabrication is not a secret in itself. You learn it in school and I’m sure you can find the informations on Internet. There are many steps and techniques though. Which asks the question of what do you actually want to do?
This is wrong about excel. Most thing excel do can be done with libreoffice. People are lazy to learn and convert their documents, and Microsoft does everything possible to make this harder.
You can block instances for yourself instead of blocking them for everyone.