apotheotic(she/they)

I’m aware, that’s why I used the word, because it was the one that I meant - I have no doubt that there are people “boycotting” the show (ie, lowering the viewer count) as some sort of protest against the woke mind virus. Or I suppose, just not watching it because they can’t stomach watching it because of the woke mind virus taking hold.

I’m sure that the anti-trans (and anti-lgbtq+ for that matter) rhetoric currently spewing across the US and much of Europe has nothing to do with the poor ratings

It was a pipedream, but I thought for a moment this was about the royal family.

I’m bullish on bog roll

(Before clicking the link): the victim is going to be a POC or vulnerable isn’t he.

(After clicking): sigh. Mob mentality and dehumanisation. Please treat other human beings with care and respect.

If you knew as much as you try to put on about biological sex, you’d know that’s its far, far more complicated than “male or female” and there are plenty of people who are assigned one thing at birth which doesn’t factually align with their biological sex. So yes, it is an assignment.

I fail to see how a rational inpatient would give the slightest fuck if the girl a bed over from them had a cock when they were born so i dont know what preferred outcome they have in this, and I can speak as a trans person to the fact that it would not be my preferred outcome to be singled out and put in my own room. I’d choose it over being in the male ward, but its not my “preferred outcome”.

So you consider “putting those weird other people in their own rooms away from the rest of us normals” to be inclusive? Its 1 step better than forcing them to be in a room full of people of the opposite gender, sure, but it sure as hell isn’t inclusive. Anyway, this conversation is over a week stale, I don’t care for it anymore. Have a nice life!

“I’m going to reply to the trans person under the premise that they don’t understand sex and gender”

The sentiment of my comment was a lot deeper than “conflating sex and gender”. The subtext was that single-sex wards where you are sorted by your AGAB are not trans (or intersex) inclusive, even if technically valid sorting criteria.

“We need to make sure that we put women in the men’s ward and men in the women’s ward. That will make people feel safer and result in fairer care” fucking transphobe terf island I hate it here

You’d be correct, but when they were manufacturing this screenshot they messed up!

Pity, could have just asked for my my friend’s transaction history, if they wanted a screenshot like this. /s

Oh don’t worry I know - I was implying that there’s a heavy correlation between Thinkpad Arch users and trans girls, at least online. See !unixsocks@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Exactly this (sent from my Arch Thinkpad as a trans woman)

Men?

Right, but a store with DRM can effectively prevent me from playing the games, that’s where my ownership effectively ends.

With GOG, there’s no DRM. So in all senses except some weird philosophical context, I do own the game. I paid money and received a file(s) that I can relocate, make backups of, burn to disc, archive, etc.

You could argue that if they revoke the license and I continue using the file that I have on my computer, that I’m now committing piracy, but that’s getting into a big technicality

How are they going to take the file off my computer?

Anything above row C is sinful lmao

I don’t want to go live in Rwanda so I may pass on this survey

Oh, I thought this was going to be a post about you being trans. Threw me with the title /j

They could have not built it on arch linux. They made decisions that were pro-consumer and thus they did not need to make decisions that were anti piracy

I think OP accidentally wrote Switch instead of Steamdeck