![](https://kbin.melroy.org/media/14/36/1436544f379b170dbb63e499734bf582a5c48a6051ea7dce3a1cb6a8c4e408c5.webp)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
They do provide releases; uYou is a tweak
[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others’ words. Weird, isn’t it?
Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0
They do provide releases; uYou is a tweak
That has a lot less features, unfortunately. Like Enhanced recently added a copy video to timestamp. Enhanced just has more active development
assuming that MS is going to 0-day patch win10 to all customers even if they haven’t paid for the extended support
I don’t see how you came to that conclusion. It sounds like they resell enterprise patches to individuals.
if you like fedora, have you tried endeavour?
Darn you broadband
3GB, actually. That was on iPhone XR, which is basically the only budge iPhone Apple has made.
We already have that since iOS 15 if you have a phone that released after the iPhone X. It’s time to become woke, sheeple.
Unfortunately, that’s like saying everyone has the right to read any book that IA usually archives for free at any time. Do I agree with that? Yes. Does it hurt intellectual property? Yes. There’s obviously evidence that readers used the service a lot. I agree with the principle, but they should’ve just temporarily “merged” with public libraries and increased borrowing limits for books in stock, not allow everyone in the United States to just get a book as long as they have less than 9 other books as well.
McNamara seemed to suggest that publishers would have been further enriched if not for IA providing unprecedented free, unlimited e-books access.
— https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/03/book-publishers-with-surging-profits-struggle-to-prove-internet-archive-hurt-sales/, linked in a link in the article
Did you update to 256.1? On Poettering’s recommendation, they made it require a config.
I think we should fail --purge if no config file is specified on the command line. I see no world where an invocation without one would make sense, and it would have caught the problem here. —poettering
And that was what they did in the patch.
They removed installing another package that did this by default in the same version where they introduced the App Center. Ubuntu Software never handled installing third-party debs, gdebi did. And in the version where they introduced the App Center, they stopped bundling gdebi by default.
Also, the old behavior was that you double click on a deb file and App Center just hangs. This was shipped in the LTS.
I’d say it’s as boat is to airplane
I saw the original LAMF post. A detail missing here was that the inspectors were joking (that it could be dangerous) at first when they saw the cut because even they didn’t know how dangerous it was.
Archive.today is way more energy-efficient and actually gives you the article details
Just use an archive service lol
That seems like a Wikipedia capture for the wrong page instead of AI.
It just updated a month ago buddy. uYou is the tweak