Rustdesk

Jesus, I can’t imagine just coming out and saying this like it’s not fucking deranged to charge people more for WATER during a heat wave.

and if there is a fire, we can raise prices of fire extinguishers, how cool is that?

Do businesses in Turkey not make sure people can do the job

i would imagine they do and checking that applicant has proper education is probably big part of that 😆

isn’t that a service already paid for

and that’s why it is a fraud, someone (state) pays for your education and you are scamming him.

deleted by creator

we are not going to ignore lunatic who thinks cheating is normal. he is perpetrating fraud worth thousands of dollars; first in tuition, then in future earnings.

would you like to be operated on by a surgeon who passed the school thanks to ai? would you like to live on a 20th floor of a building designed by such structural engineer?

its a valid question.

no, it is not.

do you really think that article talking about number of ordered planes suddenly switched to number of spare parts? does that sound logical to you? if you don’t recognize such obvious sarcasm, you really shouldn’t try to deliver burns to others, you’ll just burn yourself in the process.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Boeing_737_MAX_orders_and_deliveries

long story short: the numbers mean whole aircraft. i hope it is simple enough for you.

Not sure if this is serious.

if you are really not sure whether this:

They could be mainly orders for extra bolts.

is serious, then i recommend to not attempt crossing a street without supervision 😜

yeah, because in the world of audio/video content, who would care about quality of sound, right?

and even if people would actually not care, it still doesn’t mean that someone won’t be able to sell it to them.

Their point

oh geez, thank you for explaining someone else’s point, you must be quite an insider into their thoughts 😂

was that they never “found out”

that is not what was said

why would you need or want to be that precise about your language

you need to be precise with your language because that is what allows us to communicate ideas to each other and logic through arguments, eventually accepting or refuting them.

for example you can call these two strawberry, and nuclear submarine, but it is going to seriously hinder your communication with others, because that is now what is commonly understood under these terms.

you can see it in the comment we are discussing. because i read the implication original commenter tried to make as it never happened to me => it is not a problem that needs to be addressed.

which is incorrect implication in itself, but more importantly, as i pointed out, the premise of the implication is flawed.

unfortunately czechs dropped from 3 to just 1 seat 😒

so, all hopes on her. but definitely no pressure 😂

i mean, people have innovated in the areas they care already

so you are saying that all the innovation and research should be stopped, because if we care about any specific problem, it is already solved, and if it isn’t, it is proof we don’t care? 😆

that… is not how it works.

and unfortunately czech pirate representatives dropped from three to one :(

Not once have I encountered a trans person on a dating app who wasn’t 100% transparent about it.

…that you know of. not defending bigots or bullying, but that statement doesn’t make sense.

So I am going to sit down and the screen will be full of penis enlargement pills? What will all the hot singles in the area think?

jesus fucking christ, are you using some chatbot to drown me in a wall of text? just stop…

We don’t have a time machine to go see exactly how the future plays out.

if you think you know exactly how the future plays out, you are just insane. i am not reading the rest of it. bye.

we are talking about cheap home dsl routers here. i think that extent of the damage here is that someone has to revert to offline porn.

The 5 orders of magnitude gained from general computers to asics is standard knowledge, you learn it in the first year of any comp sci class. You can find it all over, for example.

so, it is just your wishful thinking. you have no proof that this is going to be true, you just blindly extrapolate from the past… wait, that is how this discussion started… 😂

There isn’t a difference. We don’t have some super magical mystical human thing that sets us apart.

yes, there is, i have already answered that.

A way to imagine how it can be possible for a computer to have thoughts and ideas

just imagine this thing that is at the moment impossible and we have no idea how to do it or whether it will ever be possible.

and see, once you imagine this impossible thing becoming true, this other impossible thing also becomes true.

q.e.d.

how easy, huh 😂

I think it’s important to now let what we want to be true to interfere with our analysis of what is true.

if only you would take your own medicine.

I do just want to add that my conclusion is that I, as a human, am not uniquely special for having the ability to have thoughts, ideas, and come up with new things.

of course not. monkeys can do same thing, we have already established that.

machines, however, do not.

which would be bad for the world if people in the competing nations didn’t have internet access

these people would find out that there is such thing as fm radio. and that lot of their phones is capable of receiving it.

It is arbitrary to choose that all the good ideas came from “humans”.

no, it is not. ALL ideas come from humans. period. machines don’t have an idea. they are tool aimed by a person with the idea. go there, sift through this pile of data and find a pattern in it.

If we are going to give all credit for anything AI produces to humans

we generally don’t give a credit to tools. we don’t give a credit to keyboard, microscope, centrifuge, a car, or any other tool we use in our lives. we give credit to people with ideas using these tools.

then it only seems fair to give all credit for human things to our common ancestors with chimpanzees, because if it were not for their clever ideas, we would never have been here.

no, it doesn’t seem fair to give them all credit for human things, but it seems fair to give them credit for their own actions.

But wait, we can’t stop there, because we have to give credit to the original single-celled life forms, and eventually, back to the universe itself(like I mentioned before).

it seems that extending an argument to stupid proportion so you can attack it is your favorite logical fallacy.

Look, I totally get the desire to want to glorify humans and think that we have something special that machines don’t/can’t have.

oh, the good old “lets be reasonable” approach 😆

to what is right around the corner.

got tired of arguing, so you decided to just present your position as a fact? there is lot of things “right around the corner”, but general artificial intelligence is not one of them. that doesn’t mean it is never coming, but it is absolutely not “just around the corner”.

There is not some magical difference between our calculations that make it so we can make discoveries and machines cannot.

yes, there is, and it is the very difference between GAI, which we have no idea how to approach today, and single purpose tool to sift through some data, which we have today.

so far we have no idea what that missing peace is, when we find out, that is going the be the breakthrough.

Imagine you teach your little brother how to play chess

i like how you argue against yourself.

your brother trying to beat the chess is not making any kind of discovery, is not “having ideas”.

he is trying to brute force best way through rigid set of rules, which is indeed something that machines are better than us, because they are faster than us.

when some day a machine wakes up and gets an idea (be it inventing new game other than chess, composing a song to express its feelings, or “i wonder what happens if i do this”) let me know.

Your whole point is that if people do it, then it is some special discovery thing, but if computers do it, then it is just computational brute force. There is actually no difference between the two, (…) We made programs (… ) and then it went further and in the same direction that we were trying to go.

when i teach a dog to run through agility course, it will run through it faster then i ever will. there is still difference between me and the dog.

The usual speedup when we go from using generalized hardware to specialized is about 5 orders of magnitude(10,000x).

i would be interested in reading something about this, if you have a link, because from what i have been able to google, that statement is gross exaggeration.

but no matter what - even if this hardware will exist, and will exist for affordable monetary and energetic price - that is still just speed. it is not going to help chatgpt to pretend to be better chatbot, when it already learned on all written sum of human knowledge, but can’t differentiate between trustworthy source and the onion.

it will for sure help lot of single purpose tools used for scientific research and i wish it to scientist as much as better microscopes, but the speed in itself does not constitute intelligence.

I understand wanting to see humans as having a monopoly on “intelligence”, but quite frankly that era is coming to an end.

i see you are big fan of the industry, but i would give you your own advice: don’t let your ego stand in the way of your judgement 😆