• Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Reddit wisdom:

      “This”

      “Bacon”

      “OK, boomer”

      pun thread 37 levels deep

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      5 days ago

      I wonder how Reddit investors are feeling when they find out even Google couldn’t pull something valuable out of the Reddit data

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yet I still add “Reddit” to a search query when looking for product reviews or technical/home maintenance support, lol

        I can do it really well manually…but Google’s AI sucks at it.

        They forgot to account for trolls…and how often trolls would get upvoted for the lulz

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I know it’s not “intelligent”, but I don’t get gatekeeping the phrase “AI”.

            We were perfectly happy to use “AI” to refer to the logic of computer-controlled enemies in video games for probably decades.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          sarcasm is already hard to understand online, even harder for generative AI

          I know sometimes I would take a peek at the person’s comment history to see if they were well informed / a shill for the product. The AI can’t do that

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 days ago

            Generative AI doesn’t understand anything, it just adds it to it’s model. If more people are being sarcastic than genuine in the data set, that’ll be more represented in the generated text.

            AI could categorize users by competency (i.e. how often they discuss specific topics and agree with some corpus), but I doubt it does that. It’s probably just taking posts at face value.

            • Balder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Doing that would require significantly more compute power, so there’s little economic incentive.

            • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              AI could categorize users by competency (i.e. how often they discuss specific topics and agree with some corpus), but I doubt it does that. It’s probably just taking posts at face value.

              This is not being done though right? I haven’t heard anything about content ranking with connections outside of Google seemingly using authors name is articles from large news sources.

    • Odelay42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Unfortunately it’s pocket change for them.

      Meaningless wager that despite not paying off still probably taught them an enormous amount about reddit and its users.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        I would have taught Google everything they wanted to know about Reddit and Redditors for only $30 million.