• Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Except 99.999% of personal projects won’t be that popular and allocating time for personal projects is a waste in that regard. Basically you’d be playing lottery and not get anything out of it.

    There’s plenty of reasons to encourage personal projects, but this isn’t one of them.

    • uberkalden@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Lol, downvote this guy for pointing out that it might not make sense for your company to pay for your personal projects

      • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Maybe because it’s a wise investment to encourage knowledge workers gain additional experience working on things they enjoy even if you might not be able to pick up one of those things and directly make another revenue stream out of it.

      • hibsen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I didn’t, but I get why. It’s a specious argument — it doesn’t matter if 99% of them are useless. It matters if the 1% that become ubiquitous for whatever reason provide utility that makes the useless ones worth it.

        Yeah you can run a company that never provides any time or resources to tinker, but only if you’re okay with innovation never happening again.