Leo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show to Linux@lemmy.ml · 11 months agoLXD Maintainership Being Limited To Canonical Employeeswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down14
arrow-up144arrow-down1external-linkLXD Maintainership Being Limited To Canonical Employeeswww.phoronix.comLeo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show to Linux@lemmy.ml · 11 months agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squareGargari@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·11 months agoVery sad. LXC/D is pretty good system level container, much safer/isolated than docker/podman and lighter than VMs
minus-squarearouene@emacs.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·11 months ago@Gargari @leo You can still use LXC without LXD. I never used lxd since it’s pretty much snap only.
minus-squareoldfart@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoIt’s packaged in non-Ubuntu distros (not that there’s anything wrong with just using lxc)
Very sad. LXC/D is pretty good system level container, much safer/isolated than docker/podman and lighter than VMs
@Gargari @leo You can still use LXC without LXD. I never used lxd since it’s pretty much snap only.
It’s packaged in non-Ubuntu distros (not that there’s anything wrong with just using lxc)