looks like rendering adblockers extensions obsolete with manifest-v3 was not enough so now they try to implement DRM into the browser giving the ability to any website to refuse traffic to you if you don’t run a complaint browser ( cough…firefox )

here is an article in hacker news since i’m sure they can explain this to you better than i.

and also some github docs

  • Silverseren@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, I’m using Chrome right now, but if they actually implement this and my ad blocker stops working, I’m switching to Opera or something.

    Do they really expect to not lose browser users with this move?

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So here’s the thing. This web integrity nonsense isn’t about locking people into Chrome, it’s about locking people into seeing what they’d see if they were using Chrome. The result might be more people using chrome if a website decides to DRM their content and their ads, but if you switch from one Chromium-based browser that forces you to see the ads like Chrome does to another Chromium-based browser that forces you to see the content that the website originator wants you to, like Opera, that’s still a win for Google who are more interested in forcing you to see ads for this cause than for you to use Chrome.

      The solution is voice objections to Google implementing this, to not use websites that implement DRM, and to not use web browsers that let Google dictate what the future of the web through their control of the Chromium engine

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hate to tell you this here but Opera is also chrome based…

      To be helpful here is a list of all the browsers (according to Wikipedia anyway) that are actually just three chromes in a trench coat.

      Arc
      Amazon Silk
      Avast Secure Browser developed by Avast
      Blisk 
      Brave 
      Carbonyl
      CodeWeavers 
      Comodo Dragon 
      Cốc Cốc 
      Epic Browser
      Falkon
      Microsoft Edge 
      Naver Whale
      Opera 
      Qihoo 360 Secure Browser
      qutebrowser 
      Samsung Internet
      Sleipnir 
      Slimjet:
      SRWare Iron
      ungoogled-chromium 
      Vivaldi
      Yandex Browser 
      
      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d like to believe this, and I use Librewolf as my daily driver, so yeah, Firefox woo and all that. But Google is one of Mozilla’s primary funders…how long before y’know, they tell Mozilla to cut that whole Manifest v2 shit out…?

        • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The US should break apart huge companies like google. Google in particular has WAY more power to shape the internet than any one company should have. Death to google!

          • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I agree on the first part, disagree on the second. I don’t want google to die, they have created some amazing products. I do want Google to be broken up though and for the various entities created from that to rethink about how to monetize the web. It simply can’t only be advertisements and harvesting user data.

          • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            And I’ll admit that does provide some level of reassurance. I do worry about Google pulling strings though. I suspect they keep funding Firefox not to promote their search engine as default, but rather to ensure they’re not called out as being a blatant monopoly in the Web Browser ecosystem.

          • nintendiator@feddit.cl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            But that’s just that — speak. Not any sort of contractual committment.

            And honestly, I get it. Why would the CEO be interested in keeping the company open if they stop receiving their Google raises? Just torch the franchise and run, like others even pre-Elon have done before.

    • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the point is if website operators start supporting this you might not have a choice but to use Chrome, if you want to browse any reasonably popular web site.

      • Silverseren@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then I will stop browsing them? I stopped using Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit quite easily. I can do it with others if they’re going to go down this route.

          • IonAddis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Internet Explorer tried real hard to do that. Pages were literally built only to run “properly” in IE.

            Curious what round 2 would look like.

            • nintendiator@feddit.cl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              In a world that now has stronger cryptography, attestation and surveillance capabilities? I can assure you Round 2 would go vastly different. There would also not be a Round 3.