• nevemsenki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Let’s use a protocol that shadily blocks everything google doesn’t like. Yeah, fuck that.

    • thorbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Right? Google cries about how Apple is so exclusive with their messaging and still pulls the same draconian shit. What a joke

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      What is this about?

      The main RCS benefit is sharing videos between Apple and Android that don’t look like potatoes. Can’t imagine what is being shadily blocked there.

      • cum@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        As much as they like to pretend RCS is an open standard, it’s really not. In practice, it’s a proprietary protocol to Google Messages. Which the other commenter mentioning custom roms, Google recently blocked platforms that they dont approve of from using RCS.

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    is not rcs simply another locked down standard under the thumb of google, which they have decided to limit and block on rooted devices in the past?

    correct me if im wrong ? but this all seems like a freight train of no good barelling in. google propoganda has won out and we’re swapping one gatekept standard for another.

    • Irdial@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I believe that RCS is a specification maintained by the GSM Association. That’s not to say Google is not a member (they are) and has a strong influence, but Google doesn’t own the standard either

      • tentacles9999@lemmynsfw.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Last I had looked into it, although the standard exists, they use their own servers and are not compatible with other rcs implementations

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          They are also the only RCS supplier on Android. A random messaging app can’t simply add RCS messaging functionality.

          It’s not really much of an open standard at all, in practice.

          • Kid_Thunder@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            They are also the only RCS supplier on Android. A random messaging app can’t simply add RCS messaging functionality.

            You are correct that an app can’t directly implement RCS but it can support it. RCS is implemented by the carrier, not by Google or any other text application.

            RCS is an open standard that any carrier can implement to replace SMS/MMS. The only thing special that Google does is on top of RCS is provides E2E via its own servers for handling messaging. The E2E isn’t a part of RCS, though it should be IMO. Regardless, Google doesn’t ‘own’ the Android implementation because it isn’t a part of Android, other than it can support the carrier’s implementation of RCS.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The E2EE element of RCS has basically been a property Google thing, despite all their marketing BS about RCS seeming like some sort of open universal career messaging platform.

        Although, allegedly they’ve finally relented and a universal encryption solution is now in the works.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They don’t own the standard, but they own the Android implementation of it. Other RCS implantations are hardcoded to not be supported on Android, with the exception of Samsung’s - and they had to enter an agreement with Google (that we don’t know the terms for) to do that, and even then it’s just the Google implementation under the skin. I guess similar to all iOS browsers being Safari underneath.

        It’s not open unless you create your own new operating system and implement it that way.

        Google’s implementation also adds a bunch of closed-source extensions on top of the standard.

    • Simon Müller@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      RCS itself is an open standard (kind of), but Google Messages is literally the only RCS Client

      There are no others. Like seriously you can barely find another usable RCS Client

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        sad! the world once again fell for google’s propaganda and deception just because they were able to muster up a good-guy attitude and a winning smile.

        • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          the world once again fell for google’s propaganda

          Not really — since so far nobody else has adopted RCS. And not many people use the Google one either.

          The Signal protocol is a defacto standard and on the path to becoming an actual standard. It’s already the most widely used messaging protocol today except for perhaps Email… but email would only be larger if you include messages that were sent by bots. For human sent messages, Signal is the most widely used protocol in the world.

          And as part of the DMA in Europe, Meta (which makes up most Signal users) is opening up their infrastructure so that any other messaging app can send/receive messages to their users. Which would essentially make it a perfect replacement for SMS and definitely better than RCS. You won’t have to use WhatsApp or Facebook Messenger yourself, to be able to securely contact anyone who does.

        • Simon Müller@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          yeah it’s quite disappointing, I wish Matrix saw some more (individual!) funding

          (organisations that have funded Matrix in the past generally want new features, but not core work on Matrix to make the experience any better 🥴)

    • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Can confirm they block rooted Android users intentionally, completely silently, at least when using Google’s RCS servers. The message just doesn’t send and is automatically deemed spam if you don’t pass PlayIntegrity. And the only RCS capable app is Google’s Messages, third party apps can only access SMS and MMS functionnality.

      So yeah, fuck RCS really. I was completely on board with RCS until that. Apple was right on that one. It won’t fix messaging, it just puts it in Google’s hands unless carriers finally decide to roll out real RCS instead of relying on Google to provide it.

      Third party apps had that resolved a decade ago, and Signal is just plain better.

        • Almrond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          But in order to get that ROM you need an unlocked bootloader, breaking integrity (best case scenario is device level integrity, you can’t get strong anymore). Google RCS will sort of work if you can pass Device, but in my experience things break silently if you don’t pass Strong (massively delayed messages, messages not sending, and RCS randomly disabling for no reason at all in the middle of a conversation).

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I still don’t get what’s so great about RCS over SMS/MMS? There’s E2EE but that won’t be in this implementation apparently.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Videos that don’t compress to hell when there’s both iOS and Android in a chat, that’s the main feature.

    • Simon Müller@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      okay, so, the idea was initially to build something akin to SMS/MMS in the way it’s used but make it more ready for the modern age

      just a couple of problems:

      • End-To-End-Encryption isn’t officially a part of RCS itself thanks to Telcom companies in the US not being allowed to add that
      • Google Messages is literally the only way to use RCS right now.
      • It’s “open”-ness is quite disputed due to Google’s control over it

      really, we should either be using Matrix, or at the very least build out XMPP into something more modern.

      • solarbabies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        what do you mean Telecoms companies aren’t allowed to add E2EE? there is no such regulation I’m aware of.

        besides, how would Apple have been supporting E2EE in iMessage for so long if Telecoms companies weren’t allowed?

        could be a motivation issue, but not a regulation issue.

        • Simon Müller@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well for one, iMessage runs over the internet and Apple isn’t a telecom company (Verizon, etc)

          Either way, the TL;DR is that either there must be a backdoor or something else to allow law enforcement to access communications that run over telecom companies. This doesn’t apply when a user does it, but definitely when telecom companies design a messaging protocol.

          • solarbabies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            yes I know Apple isn’t a Telecoms company but you need a SIM from a Telecoms company to use iMessage. RCS runs over the Internet too, yet you also need a SIM card for that. Also Telecoms companies aren’t designing message protocols anymore. I don’t think you know what you’re talking about.

            • Simon Müller@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              iMessage can also run over e-mail.

              And RCS was designed by the GSMA which is effectively a bunch if telecommunications companies.

  • LeTak@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    RCS makes everything better by forcing us to add a second proprietary communication standard to our phone that is advertised by Google and required by Chinese law regulations. And is also know for bad security…. What could possibly go wrong.